Government ditches landfilll plan: HK scrambles to avert looming crisis on waste

SCMP
Jan 5, 2011

Legislators pursue debate on powers to change laws

SCMP
Jan 5, 2011

Cities feed their refuse to bugs, and get biogas back

SCMP
December 3, 2010

SCMP.com - Lawmakers, greens find five ways to curb waste

SCMP.com - Lawmakers, greens find five ways to curb waste: "SCMP.com - Lawmakers, greens find five ways to curb waste"

Adrian Wan
Nov 10, 2010

Green groups and several lawmakers have come up with an action plan to reduce by two-thirds the amount of solid waste produced in the city by 2022.

The action plan aims to cut the 9,000 tonnes of solid waste generated each day to 3,000 tonnes by then.

It was devised by 19 groups and individuals - including Green Sense, Green Power, Greeners Action, WWF and lawmakers Tanya Chan and Andrew Cheng Kar-foo.

They suggest five ways to meet the target: fee-based waste disposal; increased recycling of leftover food; raising awareness of and responsibility for waste; boosting research; and building recycling and treatment facilities.

Generating less waste and promoting reuse should be the top priorities, followed by recycling and, as a last resort, methods such as incineration and landfills, Michelle Au Wing-tsz of Friends of the Earth said.

The government thinks otherwise. Environment secretary Edward Yau Tang-wah says two incinerators will be built, at Shek Kwu Chau, off Lantau, and in Tuen Mun.

Those behind the action plan said they would try to stop the incinerators being built. "Not only do we reject this plan of introducing incinerators, we will mobilise the public in a campaign against it," Au said.

Green groups involved in the action plan said the issue of waste management had been ignored for years.

Albert Lai Kwong-tak, chairman of middle-class lobby group the Professional Commons, said the city should learn from London's experience. "The former mayor of London told me they had made a mistake in building two incinerators hastily, and the city had lost the impetus to reduce waste," Lai said.

Lawmaker Cyd Ho Sau-lan, who was involved in the action plan, said getting people to buy only what they needed was critical to changing the habits of those in the world's most wasteful city. She said business would likely be in favour of the incinerators. "Asking everybody to reduce waste is tantamount to asking them to buy less," she said.

A Baptist University survey released last week concluded the city should build five more incinerators, not two. The report said while many Hongkongers still considered incineration unclean, technological improvements had made it a clean and effective way to dispose of waste.

And incinerators can also generate electricity. The report cited Macau, where an incinerator generates enough power for 33,000 families.

In Germany, 75 incinerators handle 18 million tonnes of rubbish a year and provide 60,000 jobs. In Japan, three-quarters of solid waste is burned and only 1.7 per cent goes to landfills, the report said.

Last year, the city generated 6.45 million tonnes of municipal solid waste - more than double the amount two decades ago and equal to 921 kilograms for each of its seven million people. The figure excludes construction and hazardous waste.

SCMP.com - Dioxin goal threatened by loose monitoring

SCMP.com - Dioxin goal threatened by loose monitoring: "SCMP.com - Dioxin goal threatened by loose monitoring"

Stephen Chen Nov 09, 2010 Beijing set a target to reduce dioxin emissions by 10 per cent by 2015, according to a guideline released last week. The problem is: how can they tell if the goal is reached? All new waste incinerators will be required to use the best proven technology. This is good news for European and Japanese incineration companies with undisguised interest in the Chinese market, the surface of which has only been scratched, but it also frees the incinerators from continuous monitoring. A waste-burning plant needs to be checked only once a year, and as part of the drill plants are usually informed beforehand. Jointly set by nine central government agencies including the National Development and Reform Commission, the target dictates China's international responsibility as a member of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (Pops). Dioxin is one of the deadliest Pops, according to the World Health Organisation. Long-term exposure leads to the fatal breakdown of the immune, nervous, reproductive and endocrine systems, and it causes several types of cancer, depending on the level of dioxin present in the environment, which is usually very small. Material that contains chlorine, such as ore, plastic and even paper, will release dioxin when burnt. But the dioxin breaks down when waste gas is heated to more than 850 degrees Celsius, a theory highlighted by incineration promotion brochures. However, few acknowledge that when the waste gas cools the dioxin will reappear and, if some highly expensive and energy consuming absorbing methods are not applied, will go straight into the food chain. Any dioxin of more than one billionth of a gram within one cubic metre of the waste gas discharged is considered dangerous. And that's the standard of China, the most tolerant in the world. In Europe and many other developed countries, the benchmark is one-tenth of that. China discharged more than 10 kilograms of dioxin in 2004, according to official statistics. It is estimated this increased exponentially in recent years due to the construction of many small, low-tech, poorly run incinerators. As the guideline pledges to scrap and replace those incinerators with larger ones with proven technology, "that's good news for companies from countries such as Japan and Germany", said Jiang Jianguo, professor of Tsinghua University's department of environmental science and engineering. Some domestic companies claim they can absorb as much dioxin as their overseas competitors at only a tenth of the cost. "They lie," Jiang said. The government could not verify the result by checking once a year. Continuous monitoring would not only prevent major environmental hazards, but also ease public concern about waste incineration. It is expensive and technically challenging, but possible, according to a researcher at the Laboratory of Dioxin Detection under the National Research Centre for Environmental Analysis and Measurement. To collect enough samples an inspector must clamber on top of a chimney more than 60 metres high and spend hours capturing waste gas with a netting device, a task that could not be completed without the plant's assistance, said the researcher, who refused to be named because of her employer's media policy. The analysis of the sample would take 1-1/2 months and cost tens of thousands of yuan. Repeating the task each month would require a substantial input of labour and money, she said. "But it's not impossible if it is a concern of 1.3 billion people."